| Sermons from Lone Rock Bible Church Stevensville, MT July 11, 2004 Hypocrisy in the Church (Part II) Perhaps one
of the most famous confrontations in Christian history is that between the prominent
apostles Paul and Peter as recorded in these verses. Pauls charge: hypocrisy. Its
a big deal!
In this
particular passage, verses 11 through 14, Paul is talking history and his point is to the
readers in Galatia who are having some spiritual struggles and who are blowing it in
various areas. His point is, You cant accuse me of making up this gospel, you
cant accuse me of receiving it from the apostles. You cant accuse me of being
in league with them. I am an apostle by my own right. Jesus changed me on the road to
Damascus. Jesus commissioned me and they have not given me any new information. As a
matter of fact, Im not even afraid, Paul says, to get in the apostles
face, in particular, Peter, who was the first of the apostles, the preeminent one.
He describes that encounter here beginning in verse 11, accusing Peter, the first among
equals, of all things -- hypocrisy. That is the key word were going to be discussing
as we look at these verses a little more closely. Galatians 2 11 But when Cephas (Peter) came to
Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For prior to
the coming of certain men from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles, but when they
came, he began to withdraw and hold himself aloof, fearing the party of the circumcision. 13
The rest of the Jews joined him in hypocrisy, with the result that even Barnabas was
carried away by their hypocrisy. 14 But when I saw that they were not
straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of all.
If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that
you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews? I mentioned
a week ago that I, for one, am relieved to see that Jesus never referred to his disciples
as hypocrites, He saved that word, seemingly, for those of the Pharisees and scribes,
those who had the law portending to be a certain way with it but were less than genuine.
In one real hard-hitting passage in Matthew 23, Jesus pronounces what are called the seven
woes upon the Pharisees. Im
extracting one of them because a woe is an expression of sorrow, of sadness, of demise, of
everything going wrong. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, you hypocrites, you are lost on
this matter. He uses some interesting word pictures in the 23rd chapter of
Matthew. One of the woes begins in verse 27: 27 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which on the outside appear beautiful, but
inside they are full of dead mens bones and all uncleanness. So, you, too, outwardly
appear righteous to men but inwardly, you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. A scathing
charge, to be sure. Were not talking about tombs like where Jesus was buried. Were
talking about that stone structure called a sepulcher, like a coffin that sat above
ground. In the ancient Near East, if someone had the money they could be laid to rest in
one of these big coffin-like stone structures. Because theres a dead body enclosed,
that would become a place of uncleanness. The outside
of the sepulcher or of the tomb would be engraved and painted so that it would appear to
be attractive. The reason they painted them white was so that they could be readily seen
and therefore avoided. Woe to you, scribes and
Pharisees, you hypocrites. You are like whitewashed sepulchers. You are to be seen for
what you are and avoided, lest anyone hanging around you be rendered as unclean as you
are. Hypocrites
is a hard hitting word as Jesus uses it and as the apostle Paul uses it. The
definition I suggested a week ago for hypocrisy is beyond play acting. The
word hypocrite comes from the ancient Greek theater where one actor would play several
parts by way of putting up a different mask -- one might be happy and one might be sad.
The word hypocrite developed from that scenario. By the time of the New Testament, it had
changed considerably. We have to
understand that when a Bible word is used, we need to apply it the way the Bible applies
it and not the way the world applies it. The world would tell us one thing; the Bible
would tell us quite another. Biblically, hypocrisy goes beyond the play-acting thing. Its
not just inconsistent appearance in Scripture, but rather deliberately misrepresenting the
gospel for self- serving reasons. This is not talking about a Christian who struggles with
his or her walk and someone comes up and says What a hypocrite. Youre not
doing everything you say. Who does, except Jesus? That isnt what hypocrisy is
in Scripture. The world is
wrong about things like judging. The Bible is quite clear that there is right and wrong in
moral behavior and that people are called to police their own ranks, so be careful that we
dont buy into that judge not stuff. The world loves to call Christians
self-righteous. You self-righteous Christians is a contradiction in terms. A
Christian cannot be self-righteous and be a Christian. A self-righteous person is one who
says, I can drum up my own righteousness and a Christian is one who says,
I dont have any righteousness. I have all mine from Jesus. Thats
the difference. The world gets that one wrong. The world gets the word hypocrisy wrong, as
though were supposed to run around beating ourselves over the head because we have
occasional lapses in the Christian inconsistency. Oh,
no, Im a hypocrite. Im like those scribes and Pharisees. No, thats
what the world would have us believe, but its not true. The world also was wrong
about Jesus himself. Hypocrisy is condemned The apostle
says hypocrisy is condemned. I opposed him to his face because he stood condemned.
Peter, by his actions, was confusing people about eternal issues. That is wrong. Hes
condemned because he is misrepresenting the character of God. God had lowered a sheet for
him in a vision several times saying, All foods are clean. Peter began to live
that way but when certain people from Jerusalem showed up he withdrew and separated
himself. He was
misrepresenting Gods character, and Paul used a hard word, hypocrisy, for it. Hypocrisy is often based on fear Peter was
intimidated by those who came from Jerusalem. Jerusalem was the mother church; the
Christian church was born in Jerusalem. The apostles all were centered out of Jerusalem.
Jerusalem was where Peter lived, where James, the half brother of the Lord, was the head
of the church. These fellows show up and Peter became intimidated, wanting to be sure he
pleased them, rather than adhere to what he knew to be true. Hypocrisy is often contagious Poor
behavior is easier when everyone is doing it.
Thats
a big, big deal for Paul to write because he is writing to the Galatians and his partner
on his trip to the Galatians had been Barnabas. It was Barnabas who was in on that entire
journey, Barnabas who went to Pisidia and Iconium and Derbe and Lystra, and was
considered, by one of those communities of the Galatians, to be like Zeus the god. They
had high regard for Barnabas. Paul is saying,
Look here, even your friend, even my companion, Barnabas, was sucked into this
thing. How tragic could it be? Barnabas had
been Pauls friend from early on. When Paul, who had been a persecutor of the church,
needed someone to trust him in the early church, it was Barnabas who took Paul by the hand
when he was still called Saul and said, This guy is ok. It was Barnabas, referred to as the son of
encouragement, who was generous enough to sell a big piece of his ranch and donate the
money to the apostolic cause. Barnabas was
a good guy and everybody knew him, but even the good guy messed up and play- acted to an
extreme along with Peter and the rest. Barnabas caved when he did the math. James, who was
the head of the church in Jerusalem, and these companions who had come from Jerusalem to
Antioch where Paul and Peter were, were bringing with them a measure of confusion because
as Jews it was harder for them to understand that you could be a Christian without going
through any of the Jewish rites of passage. It was hard
for them to grasp the notion that you could be a Christian, that you could go to heaven,
simply by placing your trust in the Messiah and not worrying about dietary laws, not
worrying about circumcision, not worrying about temple issues. They struggled with that
and so as a result in the Jerusalem church there was confusion, there was some strife and
they knew all about it down in Antioch. So
when these fellow came south, Barnabas looked at them and wondered if he wanted to be a
part of their confusion or not. Unwisely,
thinking he was doing the right thing, he withdrew along with Peter and misrepresented the
gospel to those who were watching. He compounded their confusion; he didnt fix it.
The problem probably was more among those Jews who were coming down than it was among the
Gentiles who were already at Antioch because here theyre coming down and thinking,
When were here, its ok to eat anything. Thats what theyre
hearing. I wonder if in Antioch you can eat anything and not get in trouble as
Christians? Theres Barnabas. Barnabas was on that first journey; Barnabas has
eaten Gentile food with Gentiles for years without any of the ceremonial issues of the
Jews. Barnabas must have it right. Imagine the confusion on those peoples part. Heres
Barnabas saying, Im not eating with Gentiles. Not when you folks are here. Now
see here, Ill wash just so, Ill eat just so, Im a good rule keeper. What has he
done? He has confused the beauty of the gospel and now the Jews and even the Gentiles are
saying, Are we supposed to eat just so? Is that part of the Christian package,
eating just so? Have we not added something to the gospel? We thought the gospel was pure
and simple: All my trust in Jesus only. Salvation by grace through faith plus nothing.
What about eating right, or plus being circumcised, or plus observing the temple
ceremonial issues. Where do you draw the line? Theyre wondering and Barnabas
and Peter and the others were simply confusing them. What does a
Christian look like anyway? Even Barnabas was caught up. Hypocrisy, then, is confusing. I
think that has to be the fundamental crime. We should never, ever confuse anybody about
the simple and beautiful gospel -- ever. Jesus came
from heaven to earth, took on the form of human flesh and as a perfect man paid our debt
to God. He went back to heaven and if we want to go to heaven too we simply put all our
trust in Him. Put all our trust in Him and get baptized? No. Plus go to church? No. Plus
go to Sunday school? No. Plus dress a certain way? Plus eat a certain way? Plus live a
certain way? No! Plus nothing. It has to
stay simple, and these brothers long ago were complicating it and confusing folks and
making things worse. Hypocrisy is confusing. Notice in verse 14:
I said
in front of everybody: Look how inconsistent you are. And by Gods
grace, Paul helped get rid of a lot of that confusion. What Peter
and Barnabas and the others had done was really put everybody in a very tough spot. Here
are the Jews struggling already with this whole issue of adding something to the gospel.
Now theyre scratching their heads and saying, So, dietary laws are
necessary? Peter is thinking, What about Acts chapter 10? What about that
vision that God gave him of the sheet being lowered from heaven with all kinds of unclean
creatures on it? Three times Peter was told, Arise, Peter, kill and eat. He
comes back with, Oh no, Lord, Ive never done anything like that. Its
ok what I, God, have declared to be clean. Dont you worry about. Its mine to
declare clean. I declare it to be clean. He has declared all foods clean. Peter,
you have no business holding back. You eat it. It will not mess you up for heaven. It will
not make you un-Christian; it will not make you second class Christian. You just do whats
before you. That
happened three times. No sooner had he wakened and shaken the cobwebs from his head than
the Gentiles showed up from down the coast of Caesarea saying, We serve this
centurion total Gentile. Hes been praying. Were supposed to come get you so
you can come into his house and share the gospel with him. Peter did, with a clear
conscience, as he should have done. Now what do
we do with that? Peter has had a habit. Paul said, Youve been eating with
Gentiles forever now, it seems. And now these Jews show up and you dont want to eat
with Gentiles any more? Youre a Jew, but youre living like a Gentile, what are
you doing? Trying to compel these Gentiles to live like Jews? Which is it? And the
confusion mounted. Jews werent
the only ones at the table. There also were a lot of Gentiles there. Paul has been real
clear with them. Look, youre a Gentile, you come to salvation the same way as
the Jews, by grace through faith. Thats it. Plus nothing. Dont
we have to join something? No. Circumcision?
No. Look
here, what are you eating? Ill have some too. See, Im a Jew and I can eat off
your plate. Its ok. We dont need these rules. The Gentiles
say, Were on the same level with the Jews? Yes. Then they see Peter
withdraw, and the text is pretty clear. Its like he drew a line in the sand, stepped
across it and said, Im not going with those Gentiles any longer. What are the
Gentiles supposed to think? Was he lying to me? Am I really a second class Christian
now, or do I have to become a Jew? Will somebody please tell me. Will somebody please help
me out? We have to
be so careful here, you and I, that we dont confuse people about being right with
God. So very careful that we dont say, You go to heaven by first praying this
prayer, then get baptized. Be careful -- salvation is by grace through faith plus
nothing. The question
is not what prayer did I pray, which words did I use, or where did I walk an aisle or any
of that stuff. The question is if you were to die tonight and stand before God, and He
said to you, Why should I let you into my heaven? you would only have one
answer and it isnt because I got the words right. It isnt because I got
baptized or because I grew up in a Christian home, or any of that. Its because I put
all my trust in Jesus only. Thats it. Sometimes we
confuse it like you can only get to heaven by a certain way. Or perhaps, Oh, so youre
a Christian. If you really want Gods blessing on your Christian life, then you do
this and this and God will bless you real good. Theres a problem with that. We
can misrepresent the gospel and erroneously and falsely and perhaps cruelly lead people to
believe if you just become a Christian everything will start going well for you. Thats
not only wrong, its mean, its cruel, and its confusing. Its a
horrible misrepresentation of the gospel. I think about Job, who was a bit confused for a
while and so were his friends. Their confusion was all surrounding what does it take
to be right with God? That was their question. His friends were saying to Job,
Everything in your whole life has fallen apart except you still have your wife. Thats
it. You dont have your health and you dont have your possessions and you dont
have your family. You dont have anything so youve been doing something really
wrong because you didnt get Gods blessing, did you? Job said,
No, Ive been real careful that I get Gods blessing. I was real careful
about my sacrifice, about my prayer life. I was doing everything fine and suddenly
everything is gone. They said evidently you werent doing everything fine
because everything is gone. Job, what you need to do is repent and get right with God and
start doing this and start doing that. So its the blind leading the blind in a
sense, trying to figure out God because the circumstances just didnt seem to add up
for a real believer. Then God showed up and gave them a talking to in a display of power
to boot. Once God
showed up, everybody quit asking questions and realized that all the details of this
relationship are a distant second to knowing God first of all. He showed up and did away
with all questions. Jobs dilemma was cured, not because he got in line with some
rules and guidelines, but because he met God and that just cleared everything up. No more
confusion. This is what
Paul did in Galatians. He said, and I think this is the key sentence of the entire
passage:
Do you see
where Paul begins? He says, This is whats true about the gospel of Jesus
Christ, and he knows its true; he knows there are no rules to keep to get to
heaven. He knows that is so, he understands that Jesus alone is sufficient to pay our way
to heaven. Paul knows that and he knows that our link to Jesus is simply trusting Him.
Thats all. Not impressing Him, not bribing Him, not manipulating Him, not fooling
Him, simply trusting Him. Paul said, Knowing that, I started there with the truth of
the gospel. Brothers and
sisters, thats where we need also to begin, What do we know to be true about the
gospel and we go from there. All the rules that we may want to adopt ought to take their
proper place in light of the truth of the simple gospel. He stood first there and then he
moved on to its effects. They werent walking straightly. The gospel is going one way
and theyre going another. He said, I brought them back to the truth. I pulled
out the map and laid it in front of their faces and said, This is how God has done
it, where are you? I think an
excellent illustration of that is Romans 14 because in the church in Rome, to whom Romans
was written, there were at least two kinds of Christians there. He characterizes two kinds
in Romans 14, he calls them the weak and the strong. Probably they were the Jews and the
Gentiles, the Jews with their rules and their structure and the Gentiles with their
freedom. This is what
he does, if you follow Pauls argument in Romans 14. He says its very, very
critical that you two groups learn to get along and this is how you do it. You dont
do it by adopting the same rules, that wont work. You do it by embracing the same
God, that will work. He says in Romans 14: 1 Now accept the one who is weak in
faith, but not for the purpose of passing judgment on his opinions. 2 One person has faith
that he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats vegetables only. He thinks he
will please God if he keeps these rules. Some people are there. Howard Hendricks, who has
been a teacher for 50 years at Dallas Seminary and a wonderful Bible teacher conference
speaker, speaking of his own marriage as an illustration -- he had been married for many
years -- When my wife and I were first married, Hendricks says, there
were all kinds of rules. You need to call me, you need to check in, you need to tell me,
and so forth. But the longer we were married the more those rules werent needed any
more. Until now, having been married for five decades or more, we dont have any
rules. We just know. We love one another and we dont need rules any longer to
accomplish the same thing it used to take rules to do. The point
being as you grow in relationship, the rules arent as necessary. Thats what
Paul is saying here in Romans 14. The behavior may amount to the same, but not because youre
keeping a rule, but because youre loving the Lord and there is a difference. Its
a difference that most of us must grow toward. Thats Pauls point in Romans 14.
He says, Let not him who eats regard with contempt him who does not eat, let not him
who does not eat judge him who eats. Why? Because God has accepted him. Do you see
what he is doing? Hes taking the problem back to the person of God. Hes taking
it back to the big picture, saying if God has accepted them, thats all you really
need to know. Do not judge the servant of another, he says. Jesus shed his
blood for, bought and paid for that person, either that person who is a rule keeper or
that person who is not. Thats all you need to know. Thats where it begins. 17 For the kingdom of God is not eating
or drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Its
God. Its knowing Him. Its being devoted to Him. Its embracing Him. Its
obeying Him. It isnt in the rules we come up with. Paul in
Galatians takes his hearers back to the truth of the gospel, saying we start there and
from there we get our guidelines. Hypocrisy is correctable The apostle
stood up, seeing they were not walking straight, remembering the beauty of the simplicity
of the gospel of Jesus and said, If you, being a Jew, live like the
Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews? What is he
doing? I sketched three steps to correcting this problem. Step one, and we see it here --
confrontation. Please clarify. If you are confusing the gospel, if I am confusing the
gospel, please ask for clarification. Do you see what youre doing, Peter? Do
you really see what youre doing? Do you get the big picture? You have these Jews
wondering now if they are supposed to keep dietary laws. You have these Gentiles wondering
now if they are second class Christians because theyre not Christians like you.
Would you please stop and see what you are doing. And does it square, not with Pauls
opinions, but does it square with the simple beauty of the gospel? Confrontation
is first. Second is truth. I will quote our brother Peter from his own epistle, First Peter, which he wrote much later. He has grown, he
has learned, he has changed, he has matured; the Lord Jesus has a hold of his life. This
is what he writes in chapter 2: 1 Therefore, putting aside all malice
and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander. Writing to
people who are where he was, knowing where they are, understanding their struggle. 2 like newborn babies, long for the
pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation, if you have
tasted the kindness of the Lord. Just like
Paul would have said, they werent walking according to the truth of the gospel. They
werent lined up with what God clearly had said and stated objectively. Long
for the pure milk of the word that by it you may grow in respect to salvation just like I
have done, Peter says, as he is much nearer the end of his life here than he was in
Galatians chapter 2. He sees it. Confrontation,
truth, and third, transformation. This is Gods work and Im so glad it is. Ill
just remind you what Romans 12:2 says: 2 And do not be conformed to this
world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, Long for the
pure milk of the word. Get the truth of Gods word into your heart and into your
mind, renew it that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and
acceptable and perfect. Thats what we do. Thats the fix. Thats the
correction. Confrontation: Do you see what youre doing? Please clarify to me
what you think you are doing. Help me understand.
Long for the pure milk of the word and God will do the transformation. There are
times in our Christian lives when we may not be sure, which is why its all the more
critical that we understand what the Bible clearly says and we hang onto that. As we stand
upon, in Pauls words, the truth of the gospel, it had to have been a tough thing for
Paul. He is taking his stand and saying, Peter, Barnabas, all you people, you are
wrong, because this is what gospel truly is: all my trust in Jesus only. He alone for my
salvation plus nothing -- and you are adding something. Thats wrong and it had to be
tough for Paul to do. There are times it may be tough for us to do. We may wonder what will people think, what will they do, how will they behave? I would suggest as Paul fleshed out for us, that we stand on the gospel and trust God with where it goes. "Scripture
taken from the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE®, © Jim Carlson 2004, Lone Rock Bible Church, Stevensville Montana, USA |